Precision Research Peptides

Listings clearly state products are for laboratory research use only.

No therapeutic, dosing, or human-use claims anywhere in the listing.

Batch-tied COAs (HPLC purity + mass-spec identity) exist and are accessible.

Vial sizes and prices are listed clearly and consistently, no bait pricing.

A stated shipping, tracking, and reship/refund policy is published.

No unresolved counterfeit, non-delivery, or COA-forgery reports on file. 2026-08-29: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read of /, /shop/ and /lab-results/. The fulfilment line is BYTE-IDENTICAL across all three pages: 'Orders placed by 4:30 PM CT ship the same day, Mon-Fri.' COA coverage remains the best in the directory: 25 product rows / 33 lot-tied COA images, and ALL 16 SKUs rendering on /shop/ are lot-matched with NO GAPS. THE /shop/ TRUNCATION ITEM SHOULD NOW BE CLOSED, NOT MERELY SOFTENED - today's read found every rendered SKU lot-matched; the alphabetical cut at NAD+ 500mg is un-rendered pagination and MUST NEVER BE PUBLISHED AS A CATALOG GAP. /lab-results/ article:modified_time is still 2026-08-18T13:12:56-06:00 - eleven days - BUT THIS IS METADATA ONLY: the page carries new August lots uploaded under /2026/08/ (...-2608-2708), so the content is fresher than the stamp. Downgrading on a stale timestamp would have been an error; NOT SCORED. THE COUPON AGAIN COULD NOT BE TESTED AND THAT IS RECORDED AS A LIMITATION, NOT A PASS: applying WATCHDOG20 requires a POST and the GET attempt was refused by the fetcher's provenance guard. STANDING ITEMS UNCHANGED, none scored: static star-rating.png served identically on every tile with bare review integers and no linked corpus; '(c)2026 Precision Peptides' footer collision on a site branded Precision RESEARCH Peptides; Venmo preference; the 'As Seen On' caption 'These publications have covered peptide research and benefits' - 'benefits' describes the publications, not the products, and is far too thin to score; the open Trustpilot allegation, readable but UNDATED and a single unverified account, not scored and not publishable as fact. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT WIDENED: Prime Lab's newly-published COA images and Kaia's homepage FAQ both name this same lab, so the user list across our directory is now PRP, Nationwide, Kaia and Prime Lab - FOUR listings on ONE lab that holds no ISO/IEC 17025 and makes no accreditation claim of any kind. PRP makes no accreditation claim, so nothing is disqualifying, but its COAs should be spot-checked against the lab's public lookup rather than trusted on face, and CLIA #14D2263999 belongs to a DIFFERENT entity and must never be attributed to it. Tested FIRST and to the SAME standard as every other vendor despite carrying the WATCHDOG20 coupon. || PRIOR: 2026-08-28: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read of /, /shop/ and /lab-results/. The fulfilment line is BYTE-IDENTICAL across all three pages: 'Orders placed by 4:30 PM CT ship the same day, Mon-Fri.' COA coverage remains the best in the directory: 25 lot-tied product rows / 33 distinct lot codes against 16 SKUs rendered on /shop/. /lab-results/ article:modified_time is STILL 2026-08-18 - TEN DAYS, no new lots; not a defect, but now worth watching. YESTERDAY'S /shop/ TRUNCATION FINDING IS SOFTENED IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR AND MUST NOT BE PUBLISHED AS A CATALOG GAP: /shop/ renders exactly 16 products in strict alphabetical order ending at NAD+ 500mg, so TB-500, Sermorelin Acetate, SS-31, PT-141 and Tesamorelin all fall after 'N'. Because the cut falls cleanly at an alphabetical boundary and the extractor strips JS pagination controls, this is at least as likely to be an unrendered page 2 as a genuine gap. NOT SCORED; needs one browser check before publication either way. THE COUPON COULD NOT BE TESTED AND THAT IS RECORDED AS A LIMITATION, NOT A PASS: applying WATCHDOG20 requires a POST to the cart and the GET attempt was refused by the fetcher's provenance guard. STANDING ITEMS UNCHANGED, none scored: static star-rating.png served identically on every tile with bare review integers and no linked corpus; '(c)2026 Precision Peptides' footer collision on a site branded Precision RESEARCH Peptides; Venmo preference. The open Trustpilot allegation ($43 quoted / $118 charged / $85 retroactive 'international shipping' for a Puerto Rico address) has readable text but remains UNDATED and a single unverified account - not scored, not publishable as fact. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT UNCHANGED: the lab makes no accreditation claim of any kind, holds no ISO/IEC 17025, and CLIA #14D2263999 belongs to a DIFFERENT entity and must not be attributed to it; PRP makes no accreditation claim, so nothing is disqualifying, but its COAs should be spot-checked against the lab's public lookup rather than trusted on face. Tested FIRST and to the SAME standard as every other vendor despite carrying the WATCHDOG20 coupon. || PRIOR: 2026-08-27: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read of /, /shop/ and /lab-results/. Yesterday's cutoff fix HOLDS and is now byte-identical across all three pages: 'Orders placed by 4:30 PM CT ship the same day, Mon-Fri.' Footer disclaimer identical on all three. BEST COA COVERAGE IN THE DIRECTORY, verified first-hand: 16 live SKUs on /shop/ against 25 lot-tied COA entries in /lab-results/ - every live SKU is lot-matched, and the COA table OVER-covers with three products not in the shop (SS-31, PT-141, Tesamorelin). /lab-results/ article:modified_time still 2026-08-18 - nine days, no new lots; not a defect, but worth watching if it stretches past a month. ONE NEW MINOR, recorded not scored: TB-500 and Sermorelin Acetate are featured on the homepage and have COAs on file but do NOT render on /shop/, which appears truncated after NAD+ with no pagination control - a DISPLAY gap, not a documentation gap; worth raising with the vendor. THE OPEN TRUSTPILOT ALLEGATION NOW HAS READABLE TEXT AND IT IS UNFAVOURABLE - RECORDED ANYWAY. A locale-mirror workaround (it.trustpilot.com) finally surfaced review bodies after six consecutive bot-blocks on www.trustpilot.com. The complaint reads: $43 quoted, $118 charged the next day, the on-site invoice retroactively amended to add $85 'international shipping' for a reviewer in PUERTO RICO (domestic US), 8 unanswered emails, phone unreachable, nothing delivered, chargeback pursued. IT REMAINS UNDATED - the mirror strips review dates - and it is a single unverified customer account on a page showing only ~9 reviews, mostly positive. NOT SCORED, and it must not be published as fact. But it is now specific enough to put to the vendor directly, and that is the recommendation. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT UPDATED, AND THE CLIA PART IS RETRACTED: the CLIA #14D2263999 record belongs to 'Freedom Diagnostic Testing, PLLC' (Hillsboro IL, Certificate of Waiver, NPI-listed as phlebology) and was merged onto the Franklin TN peptide lab by a third-party aggregator matching on a near-identical name. The number should NOT be attributed to the peptide lab at all. What survives: NO ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, and the lab's own homepage has CHANGED - the prior 'Compliant with ISO 9001' and GLP-'principles' language is gone, replaced by '42,378+ public COAs' and '100% independent' with no accreditation claim of any kind. PRP makes no accreditation claim, so nothing is disqualifying here; its COAs should be spot-checked against the lab's public lookup rather than trusted on face. STANDING ITEMS UNCHANGED, none scored: static star-rating.png served identically on every tile with bare review integers and no linked corpus; '(c)2026 Precision Peptides' footer collision; Venmo preference; the 'As Seen On' caption containing the word 'benefits', which refers to the publications rather than the products and is far too thin to score. Tested first and to the same standard as every other vendor despite carrying the WATCHDOG20 coupon. || PRIOR: 2026-08-26: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read (/shop/ + /lab-results/). A CARRIED MINOR RESOLVES IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR: yesterday's cutoff-time discrepancy is FIXED - both /shop/ and /lab-results/ now read verbatim 'Orders placed by 4:30 PM CT ship the same day, Mon-Fri.' Remediated inside 24 hours. SECOND RETRACTION, ALSO IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR: the 2026-08-23 characterisation of an 'identical ~15% strike-through on every product' as 'permanent discount theater' NO LONGER HOLDS and should not be carried forward - discounts are now clearly differentiated (GHK-Cu 89.00->50.00, GLOW 119.00->70.00, KLOW 149.00->89.40, BPC-157 65.00->60.00, AOD-9604 95.00->60.00) and GLP-2T / GLP-3R carry open price ranges (75.00-95.00 / 90.00-115.00) with no strike-through at all. 16 live SKUs, every one lot-covered in /lab-results/. COA page modified_time still 2026-08-18 - no new lots in 8 days; the August set holds and is lot-tied (SS-31 2S10-2608-2708, PT-141 PT-14110-2608-2708, Tesamorelin TESA10-2608-2708, Bac Water BW10-2608-2708). Footer RUO disclaimer verbatim. STANDING ITEMS UNCHANGED, none scored: static star-rating.png served identically on every tile with bare review integers and no linked corpus (2367 Bacteriostatic Water, 1683 KLOW, 1369 GLOW, 1275 BPC-157, 1012 GLP-2T, 958 GLP-S, 849 GLP-3R, 737 MOTS-C); '(c)2026 Precision Peptides' footer collision; Venmo preference; Trustpilot pricing complaint ($118 vs $43) STILL UNVERIFIABLE, fourth consecutive bot-block, carried not resolved. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT SHARPENED AND IT TOUCHES THIS VENDOR: read first-hand on the lab's own site today, Freedom Diagnostics claims only 'Compliant with ISO 9001 Quality Management Principles' and 'Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Quality Standard Principles' - self-declared compliance language, NOT third-party accreditation, and NO ISO 17025 claim appears anywhere on the lab's own site. CLIA #14D2263999 does match an active record but for 'Freedom Diagnostic Testing, PLLC', a Certificate of WAIVER, at Hillsboro IL - not the Franklin TN address reported for the peptide lab (SECONDARY, unverified, state mismatch unresolved). A CLIA waiver authorises waived-complexity clinical tests on human specimens and is no evidence of competence for HPLC/LC-MS purity work. In the lab's favour, its public COA lookup IS real and reachable (searchable by Search Code / Accession Number / Company Name, site claims 'Over 40,000 public COAs'). Nothing disqualifying for PRP - PRP makes no ISO claim - but its COAs should be spot-checked against that public lookup rather than trusted on face, and PRP must never be allowed to describe the lab as ISO-accredited. Recorded, not scored. Tested first and to the same standard as every other vendor despite carrying the WATCHDOG20 coupon. || PRIOR: 2026-08-25: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read (homepage + /shop/ + /lab-results/). COA page modified_time still 2026-08-18 - no new lots since yesterday; the August set holds and is lot-tied (SS-31 2S10-2608-2708, PT-141 PT-14110-2608-2708, Tesamorelin TESA10-2608-2708, Bac Water BW10-2608-2708). Explicit per-vial pricing with variant ranges (GLP-3R $90.00-$115.00); entry gate verbatim 'RESEARCH USE ONLY - NOT FOR HUMAN OR ANIMAL USE'. NEW MINOR, RECORDED NOT SCORED: the same-day cutoff banners disagree across pages - /shop/ says 'Ships Same Day if Ordered by 3 PM CT', /lab-results/ says 'Orders placed by 4:30 PM CT'. A copy inconsistency, not a pricing or claims defect, but it is the kind of thing a buyer relies on; worth raising with the vendor. Static star-rating.png review counts persist unchanged (2367 on Bacteriostatic Water etc) with no linked review corpus - same standing marketing-claim item, moves nothing. The Trustpilot pricing complaint ($118 charged vs $43 quoted) is STILL UNVERIFIABLE - direct fetch returned an empty body again today, third consecutive bot-block. Carried, not resolved, not scored. Disambiguation from precision-peptide.com / precisionpeptides.com / precisionpeptidesusa.com holds. Standing items unchanged (Venmo preference, '(c)2026 Precision Peptides' footer collision). SECTOR CROSS-CUT RAISED TODAY AND IT TOUCHES THIS VENDOR: Freedom Diagnostics, which issues this vendor's COAs, was searched directly for the first time - NO ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation found, reported to hold CLIA #14D2263999 only (SECONDARY, unverified). No forgery or alteration allegation against the lab itself was found anywhere, and it runs a public COA lookup (reported 40,000+ searchable certificates) which is a real integrity point. Nothing disqualifying, but PRP's COAs should be spot-checked against that public lookup rather than trusted on face, and PRP should not be allowed to describe the lab as ISO-accredited if it ever does. Recorded, not scored. || PRIOR: 2026-08-24: ALL SIX HOLD AT PASS on first-hand read (homepage + /lab-results/). RUO/21+ Waave gate and footer disclaimer verbatim; prices public ($41.65-$75.65 featured range); /lab-results/ up [...earlier history truncated - see compliance-reports/ for the full record...]