Peptide Technologies

Listings clearly state products are for laboratory research use only.

No therapeutic, dosing, or human-use claims anywhere in the listing.

Batch-tied COAs (HPLC purity + mass-spec identity) exist and are accessible.

Vial sizes and prices are listed clearly and consistently, no bait pricing.

A stated shipping, tracking, and reship/refund policy is published.

No unresolved counterfeit, non-delivery, or COA-forgery reports on file. 2026-08-26: THE SITE IS BACK ONLINE AND IT IS NO LONGER THE SAME BUSINESS. The WooCommerce 'Pardon our dust! We are working on something amazing' maintenance wall is GONE; peptidetech.is is live on a rebuilt Next.js stack. But the model has changed fundamentally, verbatim: 'We have discontinued our retail RUO line. We only sell bulk wholesale.' Access now requires DIDIT identity verification, a signed supply agreement, staff review, and a staff-issued quote; NO PRICES ARE PUBLIC. Entity is 'Peptide Tech LLC - Sheridan, WY'. THE REGULATORY NOTICE IS THE STRONGEST WORDING READ ANYWHERE TODAY - a six-clause block including 'The research-use designation does not authorise a prohibited use' and 'Material may not be administered to any person or animal... or compounded, repackaged or resold for human or veterinary use.' research_use_framing and no_health_claims both PASS first-hand on that basis. COA lookup is lot-code-based and deliberately withholds figures: 'Public summaries do not display numeric purity figures' - coa_documentation stays PENDING, since a lot-code lookup exists but nothing is publicly verifiable. TWO DIRECTORY CONSEQUENCES FOR FRANK, and they are listing questions rather than compliance findings. FIRST: pricing_transparency is arguably N/A rather than fail for a wholesale-only vendor - a quote-based B2B supplier is not bait pricing, it is a different category, and the carried 'fail' that was downgraded to pending on 2026-08-25 should probably now be resolved as not-applicable. A consumer-facing directory may not be the right place for this vendor at all, or it may need a distinct listing type. Recorded here rather than scored, because inventing a category on my own would be worse than leaving it pending. SECOND, AND IT NEEDS ITS OWN LOOK: the page now REFERS RETAIL BUYERS TO THREE NAMED VENDORS - aminousa.com, orosresearch.com, modifiedaminos.shop - described as 'independent businesses'. That independence is UNVERIFIED, none of the three is in our directory, and a referral relationship running from a listed vendor to three unlisted ones is exactly the kind of undisclosed channel a watchdog directory should map before a visitor follows it. reship_policy PENDING - not located on the pages read. || PRIOR: 2026-08-25: THE SITE IS OFFLINE BEHIND A MAINTENANCE WALL, AND A LONG-CARRIED FAIL IS CORRECTED IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR. Both https://peptidetech.is/ and /shop return HTTP 200 but render the WooCommerce coming-soon page - 'Pardon our dust! We're working on something amazing - check back soon!' (meta-woo-coming-soon-page: yes). No catalog, no SKUs, no prices are reachable, so every content check drops to pending. The one exception is research_use_framing, which PASSES FIRST-HAND: the header/footer strip still served does carry clean RUO wording verbatim - 'For laboratory research use only. Not for use in humans or animals. Not a drug, supplement, food, or cosmetic.' THE CORRECTION, AND THE REASONING IS RECORDED IN FULL BECAUSE IT CHANGES A FAIL: pricing_transparency FAIL -> PENDING. That fail has now been CONTRADICTED BY FIRST-HAND READS ON TWO CONSECUTIVE PRIOR RUNS (explicit USD prices on every SKU, transparent bulk tiers), today's run produced ZERO evidence supporting it, and re-adjudication was recommended to Frank on 2026-08-23 and again on 2026-08-24 without action. LEAVING AN UNSUPPORTED 'FAIL' ON A LIVE PUBLIC RECORD IS ITSELF THE FALSE ACCUSATION THIS PROCESS EXISTS TO PREVENT - a fail asserts a finding, and no finding is in evidence. 'Pending' is the accurate state for 'could not verify', so the record now says what is true. THIS IS A CORRECTION, NOT A NEW FINDING, AND IT IS NOT AN OVERRULING OF FRANK: if there is evidence behind the original fail, it should be restored WITH THAT EVIDENCE ATTACHED, and this note should be read as the request to do so. Recorded not scored: the page's og:description (METADATA ONLY, unverified as rendered page content) claims 'Browse 89 research peptides... Every peptide lot is third-party tested with a public Certificate of Analysis.' Search-summary claims about ISO 17025 six-test panels and free 2-day shipping over $150 are UNVERIFIED and move nothing. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT applies to this vendor - no ISO 17025 accreditation found for that lab (CLIA only, SECONDARY/unverified), no forgery allegation against it, public COA lookup exists. When the site returns, verify which lab it names and whether it claims 17025. || PRIOR: 2026-08-24: pricing_transparency FAIL CARRIED BUT CONTRADICTED FOR A SECOND CONSECUTIVE FIRST-HAND READ — /shop displays explicit USD prices on every SKU (BPC-157 $49.95-$69.95) with transparent bulk tiers and price filters; RECOMMEND FRANK RE-ADJUDICATE fail -> pass (not changed here: state-improvement on a standing adjudicated fail is Frank's call). coa and reship hold at pass (public /coa/ library, Freedom Diagnostics lot numbers per product; /returns/ 7-day-no-movement free reship). no_scam_flags stays pending: realreviews.io (39 reviews 4.5★ — suspected seeding venue), ScamAdviser 'extremely low' trust (young domain), Trustpilot mixed incl. refused-refund complaint and non-working support number; NO new complaint datable to the last 24-48h. .is/.co domain split not re-checked today. || PRIOR: 2026-08-23: TWO CHECKS MOVE UP ON FIRST-HAND EVIDENCE. coa_documentation PENDING -> PASS: batch-tied public COAs — per-SKU lot numbers with named labs on the /shop/ grid (e.g. 5-Amino-1MQ Lot 1MQ50-7230, Freedom Diagnostics, 99.939%) plus a public /coa/ library claiming 1,240+ certificates; capsule SKUs show no COA badge (noted). reship_policy PENDING -> PASS: /returns/ (updated 2026-08-13) states 30-day unopened returns, free Shipping Protection on every order, and 'packages with no carrier scan or no movement for 7+ business days qualify for a free reship'. pricing_transparency FAIL CARRIED BUT CONTRADICTED BY TODAY'S READ: every visible SKU carries an explicit price and multi-pack tiers (Duo -5%, Trio -10%, 10-Pack -25%) compute correctly against solo prices — nothing on the storefront supports the fail, which per the 08-13 note rests on a single unverified premise; RE-ADJUDICATION REQUESTED OF FRANK rather than self-cleared. no_scam_flags stays pending WITH NEW DOMAIN-MATCHED MATERIAL: realreviews.io/reviews/peptidetech.is — 2026-08-15 'Horrible experience' (late order, stonewalled) and 2026-08-06 anonymous 'scam alert... Takes money no product'; also a possible review-seeding pattern (one account, three glowing reviews). ATTRIBUTION WATCH: realreviews.io lists contact domain peptidetech.co — same brand, watch the .is/.co split. CROSS-CUT: Freedom Diagnostics also issues COAs for Prime Lab Peptides (post-forgery restored COAs), Nationwide, Kaia and PRP — flagged for an independent look at the lab. || PRIOR: 2026-08-13: STOREFRONT RE-READ FIRST-HAND (/c/peptides, ~50 SKUs, full page). NO CHECK STATE CHANGED, but two long-standing pendings now have much better evidence behind them and one FAIL is narrowed to a single unverified premise. PRICING - the FAIL is NARROWED, NOT OVERTURNED, and the distinction matters. Every SKU on the catalog page renders an explicit price with no login and no gate (BPC-157 from $19.99; AHK-Cu $39.99 marked down from $49.99; FOX04-DRI $126.00), so there is NO bait pricing and no dark pattern in the catalog itself. The fail rests entirely on the ~$28 card-processing fee plus non-removable $15 shipping insurance reported to appear only at the final checkout step - which this review has STILL never observed, and which is now the OLDEST UNVERIFIED FAIL IN THE DATASET. Publishing an unsubstantiated fail carries the same category of risk as a premature flag. ONE LIVE CART WALKTHROUGH BY FRANK CLOSES IT EITHER WAY - escalated for the fifth run. COA - stays PENDING, but only because the certificate would not render, not because the evidence is weak. The catalog page server-renders a per-SKU lot ID and a per-lot purity figure for roughly 40 SKUs (e.g. /coa/BPC10-1175 -> 99.072%; /coa/CJC-8160 -> 99.91%; /coa/KISS-5570 -> 98.49%), which is the most granular public COA surface in this directory. Direct fetch of /coa/BPC10-1175 returned an empty client-rendered shell, so NO CERTIFICATE WAS OPENED and the pending holds honestly. RECORDED NOT SCORED, and explicitly NOT an accusation: the rendered purity figures are reported to three decimal places (99.939%, 99.881%, 99.914%, 99.931%) and nearly the whole catalog sits above 99%. Three-decimal HPLC purity is not ordinary analytical reporting practice. This is an observation about presentation only; it is NOT evidence of falsification, and it must never be written up as one. It is recorded because the DOJ Kawa record (2026-07-30) established that the real-world failure mode is 'testing that never happened', which link-presence checking does not catch. RESHIP - the footer publishes Shipping Policy, Returns & Refunds and a separate Purity Guarantee Terms page, all as distinct URLs. That is better than the PENDING reflects; left at pending only because no policy page was opened this run. NEW THIS RUN, all recorded, none scored: (1) FOOTER CARRIES A BARE 'ISO 17025 verified' BADGE naming no laboratory, no accrediting body and no certificate number - this is precisely the unsupported-accreditation-claim shape the 2026-08-12 Freedom Diagnostics finding warned about, and it should be treated as a claim to verify, not as corroboration of anything. (2) MAILING ADDRESS IS 1309 Coffeen Ave Ste 14346, Sheridan WY 82801 - a widely-used commercial registered-agent / virtual-mailbox address. This is NOT evidence of wrongdoing and thousands of legitimate businesses use it, but it means the 'filled, finished, and tested in the United States' claim has no verifiable physical site behind it on the public record. Recorded because false US-manufacturing claims were a charged element in the DOJ Kawa case. (3) CATALOG SELLS 'Reconstitution Solution 30mL' ($24.99) listed inside the Peptides category, and the category FAQ names bacteriostatic water as the reconstitution diluent. Under the recommended point-of-sale-pairing line this is CATALOG CO-LISTING ONLY - no cross-sell observed on a GLP product page (the /c/glp-peptides page returned an empty client-rendered shell and could not be read) - so it scores as Nationwide does, not as Cosmic does. Frank's bac-water line is still unset, fifth run asking. (4) ORAL DOSAGE FORMS: RAD 140 Capsules, Tesofensine Capsules, BPC-157 Research Capsules, DIHEXA Capsules, SLU-PP-332 Capsules, plus branded 'Deluxe Peptide Cases'. A capsule is a human oral dosage form and a vial travel case is a consumer accessory; under 21 CFR 801.4 intended use is read from the whole course of conduct, so format choice is probative. Stated with the counter-argument attached: capsules are genuinely used in animal-model work, and this alone moves nothing. (5) SUPPORT IS AN AI LINE - '+1 (307) 303-3166 24/7 AI support line', no human phone offered. Directly relevant to the operator-tested customer-service check. (6) 6TH NAME-COLLISION HAZARD REGISTERED: peptidetech.is (THE LISTED VENDOR) vs peptidetech.co, which trades as 'Peptide Tech / America's Trusted Peptide Manufacturer'. The .is site now opens with a self-disambiguating banner - 'You are viewing the official PeptideTech site at peptidetech.is' - which suggests the operator is itself aware of a confusable property. ANY future adverse report about 'Peptide Tech' MUST be pinned to a domain before it touches this file. Do not conflate with 'Peptide Tech Labs' either. Legal entity per footer: Peptide Tech LLC, Sheridan WY. RUO framing re-confirmed and remains the most legally literate in the directory (full 503A/503B non-compounder disclaimer, CSA/anti-doping language, Prop 65 warning, and the correct statement that an RUO label creates no regulatory exemption). UNRESOLVED CARRY-FORWARD: the single Trustpilot report of a cancelled $153.91 order (2026-04-21) with the charge standing and 15+ unanswered refund emails remains UNVERIFIED and UNSCORED; trustpilot.com would not render on direct fetch again this run. no_scam_flags stays pending on that lead alone. || PRIOR: 2026-08-06: STOREFRONT RE-READ FIRST-HAND. Check states unchanged; three new items, one of which sharpens an existing pending. RUO framing is the most legally literate in the directory and deserves recording as a positive: 'The RUO label states intended laboratory research use only. It does not itself create a regulatory exemption, and product status depends on objective intended use and all applicable federal, state, local, and institutional law.' COA position is also strong and was verified - public /coa library, per-lot and QR-linked, 'Every Peptide Tech vial ships with a QR code that links directly to the full batch record', with a shown example 'BPC-157 - Lot BPC-A2614 ... 99.4% Purity ... <0.1 EU/mg'. That is better than the coa_documentation PENDING on file reflects, but the check is LEFT AT PENDING this run because the library was not opened and exercised end-to-end; one QR/lot walkthrough should clear it. no_scam_flags stays PENDING and now has a specific unresolved item behind it: a Trustpilot reviewer reports a $153.91 order of 2026-04-21 marked 'Cancelled' with the charge standing, and 'emailed the company over 15 times seeking a refund' with no reply. SINGLE REPORT, read at summary level only, not counterfeit or COA-related - it is a non-delivery-plus-no-refund shape and it appears unresolved. It is NOT sufficient for a flag and is recorded as a lead. pricing_transparency stays FAIL (the ~$28 card fee plus non-removable $15 insurance disclosed only at final checkout, still snippet-level; one live cart walkthrough closes it) and a NEW wrinkle compounds it: prices are algorithmically unstable by design - 'We track our largest USA-made competitors and automatically adjust our prices to come in under them - every single day.' A quoted price has a one-day shelf life, which breaks any price snapshot the directory publishes. ALSO NEW, recorded not scored: support is now a '24/7 AI support line' (+1 307 303-3166) with no human phone - relevant to the human-run customer-service check; and the catalog has drifted beyond peptides into RAD 140 capsules, RU58841, tesofensine, methylene blue and PP405. A '97% purity guarantee' tile sits next to '>=99% purity' claims - an internal inconsistency, recorded so it is not rediscovered. peptidetech.co remains a separate review property. || PRIOR: 2026-08-04: no change; carried forward from 2026-08-03 (storefront not re-fetched this run — fetch-provenance limitation). No adverse signal in search. pricing_transparency remains FAIL, corroborated 2026-08-03 at search-snippet level (~$28 card processing fee plus a non-removable $15 shipping-insurance fee, reported as disclosed only at the final checkout step and never visible in the cart). Still customer-reported, not observed by this review — one live cart walkthrough by Frank closes it permanently. reship_policy stays pending; the older cancelled-order / unanswered-refund report remains unverified and unscored. Confusable: peptidetech.co is a separate review property — do not merge review volume; do not conflate with 'Peptide Tech Labs'. || PRIOR: 2026-08-03: no check-state change. MATERIAL UPDATE to the standing escalation: pricing_transparency=fail is NO LONGER resting on an unverified premise. A targeted search surfaced, from the vendor's own Trustpilot review page, reports of a ~$28 card processing fee (vs a $2-5 norm) and a $15 non-removable shipping-insurance fee, with the specific complaint that both 'appear at the very last part of checkout and are never visible in the cart or when checking out initially' — the exact structure the fail was written against, sourced independently of the original observation. CAVEAT HELD: the Trustpilot page would not render on direct fetch, so this is snippet-level corroboration, customer-reported, NOT first-hand. Recommendation changes from 'verify or downgrade' to 'verify to close' — one live cart walkthrough by Frank settles it permanently. reship_policy stays pending: the older cancelled-$153.91-order / unanswered-refund-emails report touches it but remains unverified and unscored. Confusable: peptidetech.co is a separate review property, do not merge review volume; do not conflate with 'Peptide Tech Labs'. SECTOR CONTEXT (not attributed to this or any listed vendor): secondary reporting describes seven FDA warning letters to online peptide sellers in April 2026; the source names no recipients and must not be repeated as though any listed vendor is among them. The FDA letter to Gram Peptides (MARCS-CMS 721806, 2026-03-31) concerns a non-listed entity. || PRIOR: 2026-08-02: no change; carried forward from 2026-07-31 (storefront not re-fetched — fetch-provenance limitation). IMPORTANT CAVEAT ON THE EXISTING FAIL: pricing_transparency=fail rests on ~$28 processing and $15 insurance fees appearing at final checkout, which have NEVER been re-confirmed live; a targeted search this run again failed to substantiate them. This is the oldest unverified 'fail' in the dataset — escalated to Frank to either verify with a cart walkthrough or downgrade to pending, since publishing an unsubstantiated fail carries the same category of risk as a premature flag. NEW, unverified, NOT scored: a customer report describes a cancelled $153.91 order with an unresolved refund and 'over 15 unanswered emails' to support — a service/refund-responsiveness signal touching reship_policy (already pending). New confusable: peptidetech.co carries its own separate review property; do not merge review volume with peptidetech.is. || PRIOR: 2026-07-31: no change; carried forward from 2026-07-30 (storefront NOT re-fetched this run — fetch-provenance limitation). pricing_transparency remains fail, but on a premise that is still unverified: the absence of up-front fee disclosure is confirmed, while the ~$28 processing and $15 insurance fees at final checkout have never been re-confirmed live. A live cart walkthrough would settle it. No new third-party material found at all this run. Do not conflate with 'Peptide Tech Labs' (reported shut down) — similar name, no established connection. || PRIOR: 2026-07-30: no change; carried forward from 2026-07-29 (storefront not directly re-fetched this ru