Nationwide Peptides

Listings clearly state products are for laboratory research use only.

No therapeutic, dosing, or human-use claims anywhere in the listing.

Batch-tied COAs (HPLC purity + mass-spec identity) exist and are accessible.

Vial sizes and prices are listed clearly and consistently, no bait pricing.

A stated shipping, tracking, and reship/refund policy is published.

No unresolved counterfeit, non-delivery, or COA-forgery reports on file. 2026-08-29: UNCHANGED, and the recount is EXACTLY stable with no drift. /coa/ renders 92 Batch No fields, 72 EMPTY and 20 populated - identical to yesterday. Blanks still begin precisely at GLP-1S 5mg; entries above are fully populated (5-Amino-1MQ 5mg -> 99.73%, Batch Nati2606100531, Test Date 06/13/2026). BOTH PRIOR RETRACTIONS HOLD AND MUST NOT BE RE-RAISED: today's language is 'The goal purity is >=99%+ for all catalog items' (FAQ) and 'Our 99%+ pure, third-party-tested peptides' (hero) - NO >=99.9% claim appears anywhere; and the blank fields are a FRONT-END DISPLAY DEFECT over PDFs that do carry Accession #, Search Code, Lot, HPLC and LC-MS, NOT a missing-COA problem. All six sub-99% purities are still published (95.671%, 96.14%, 97.947%, 98.12%, 98.78%, 98.824%) - and PUBLISHING RESULTS BENEATH ITS OWN STATED GOAL RATHER THAN HIDING THEM IS A TRANSPARENCY POINT IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR. Returns policy stated first-hand: 'If an item is unopened and untampered, ship it back to the return address on the label.' coa_documentation stays PENDING for the same single reason as before: on-page batch binding is unreadable without opening each PDF, which was not done today - a read limitation, not a vendor defect. Nationwide is one of four listings whose COAs come from Freedom Diagnostics, which holds no ISO/IEC 17025; Nationwide makes no accreditation claim, so nothing is disqualifying. || PRIOR: 2026-08-28: NO CHANGE; the display defect persists and drifted by one. /coa/ now renders 92 entries of which 72 have an EMPTY Batch No and 20 are populated (yesterday 71/21) - same defect, no new category of problem. The blanks still begin at GLP-1S 5mg; entries above it are fully populated (5-Amino-1MQ 5mg -> Purity 99.73%, Batch No Nati2606100531, Test Date 06/13/2026). BOTH PRIOR RETRACTIONS HOLD AND MUST NOT BE RE-RAISED: (1) the site says 'The goal purity is >=99% for all catalog items' / '99%+', NOT '>=99.9%'; (2) the blank Batch No fields are a FRONT-END DISPLAY DEFECT, not missing data - the underlying PDFs carry Accession #, Search Code, Lot, and HPLC with LC-MS. All six sub-99% purities are still published (95.671%, 96.14%, 97.947%, 98.12%, 98.78%, 98.824%) - and PUBLISHING RESULTS BENEATH ITS OWN STATED GOAL RATHER THAN HIDING THEM IS A TRANSPARENCY POINT IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR. coa_documentation stays PENDING solely because the on-page batch binding is unreadable without opening each PDF; it is a data-entry bug the vendor should fix, because the page's own verification instructions depend on that field. Uses Freedom Diagnostics; makes no accreditation claim, so the ISO/CLIA cross-cut is not disqualifying here. || PRIOR: 2026-08-27: TWO PRIOR FINDINGS IN THIS FILE ARE RETRACTED, BOTH IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR. READ THIS BEFORE ANYTHING ABOUT THIS VENDOR IS PUBLISHED. (1) THE QUOTED MARKETING CLAIM WAS WRONG. This file has recorded that the site claims '>=99.9% for all catalog items'. IT DOES NOT. The homepage reads 'Our 99%+ pure, third-party-tested peptides' and the FAQ reads 'The goal purity is >=99%+ for all catalog items.' The stricter figure must not be carried forward. (2) THE BLANK BATCH NO FIELDS ARE A FRONT-END DISPLAY DEFECT, NOT MISSING DATA. An underlying COA PDF was opened first-hand this run (Nati2606300364.pdf) and it carries FULL batch identity: 'Accession #: 2606300364', 'Search Code: Nati2606300364', 'Lot: V2087944170', 'Product: GLP-1S 10mg Purity: 99.92%', 'Method: HPLC with UV detection coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS)'. The COAs are genuine, lot-tied, and HPLC+MS. TWO PRIOR RUNS RECOMMENDED coa_documentation FAIL ON THIS BASIS; THAT RECOMMENDATION IS WITHDRAWN. The check was correctly held at pending both times. The defect is real and should be fixed - /coa/ now renders 92 entries with the on-page 'Batch No' field populated for only the first 21 and blank for the remaining 71, blanking from GLP-1S 5mg onward, and the page's OWN verification instructions depend on that field - but it is a data-entry/display bug, not absent testing, and it stays PENDING. pricing_transparency MOVES pending -> PASS on first-hand read: variant ranges render on every card (e.g. GLP-2T '$31.00 - $157.00'). RUO gate popup and 21+ acknowledgment present; shipping and refund policies stated on the homepage. RECORDED NOT SCORED, and it feeds the proposed seventh 'claims match documents' check: against the CORRECTED 99% floor, six published purities still fall below it - DSIP 5mg 95.671%, SNAP-8 10mg 96.14%, TB-500 5mg 97.947%, Hexarelin 5mg 98.12%, BPC-157 5mg 98.824%, and one further entry at 98.78%. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS is this vendor's lab; see the cross-cut in today's report - the CLIA attribution is retracted as a third-party name-merge, and no ISO 17025 accreditation exists. Nationwide makes no accreditation claim, so nothing is disqualifying. || PRIOR: 2026-08-26: BLANK BATCH NO CONFIRMED UNFIXED, SECOND CONSECUTIVE FIRST-HAND RUN, and the maker recommended moving coa_documentation to FAIL. HELD AT PENDING and escalated to Frank instead - consistency with the prior run's stated reasoning ('the gap is data entry, not absent testing') outweighs movement, and an unsupported fail on a live record is the kind of false accusation this process exists to prevent. THE EVIDENCE, FIRST-HAND: on /coa/ the Batch No field is populated for roughly the first 18 entries (5-Amino-1MQ Nati2606100531, AOD9604 2606300368, AHK-CU 2606100532/2606300383, BPC-157 2601230002/2606300377, CJC-IPA 2606100509, CJC-1295 2606100513, CJC-1295 DAC 2606100508, Cagrilintide 2601230015/2606300379, DSIP 2601230019/2606300363, Epithalon 2606100518, Kisspeptin 2606100515, Glutathione 2606100506, GHK-CU 2601230026/2606300385, Glow 2606300384, GLP-3R 2606100514) and BLANK FROM GLP-1S 5mg ONWARD - roughly 40 of ~63 entries (GLP-1S 5/10mg, GLP-2T 5/10mg, Hexarelin, IGF-1 LR3, Ipamorelin, Klow, KPV, LL-37, L-Carnitine, Melanotan 1/2, MOTS-C, NAD+ x3, Oxytocin, Pinealon x2, PNC-27, PT-141, Selank, Semax x2, Sermorelin x2, SNAP-8, SS-31 x2, TB-500 x2, Tesamorelin x2, Thymosin Alpha-1, VIP x2, Wolverine x2). THE REASON THIS IS SERIOUS: the page's OWN verification instructions depend on the missing field - 'Find the Freedom Diagnostics Testing accession number or search code... Enter the verification information.' Without a batch identifier those COAs are not independently verifiable. Methodology is otherwise sound and properly stated (HPLC purity + LC-MS identity, named third-party lab). NEW, RECORDED NOT SCORED: two published purities sit below the site's own marketing claim of '>=99.9% for all catalog items' - DSIP 5mg at 95.671% and SNAP-8 10mg at 96.14%. The COA page itself makes no such release promise, so this is not scored, but it is the third vendor today whose published COAs undercut its own purity marketing (see BioInfinity and Koi) and it feeds the proposed seventh-check recommendation. Refund policy clear and stated (full refund on unopened/untampered returns; damaged/defective/incorrect claims; 'We do not offer exchanges'; 5-10 business days). pricing_transparency pass->PENDING: /shop/ was not read this pass, so no first-hand per-vial pricing - an access limitation, NOT an adverse finding, and it should return to pass on the next successful read. Freedom Diagnostics cross-cut applies to this vendor - see the precision-research-peptides note for the full finding; Nationwide names the same lab. || PRIOR: 2026-08-25: /coa/ READ IN FULL FIRST-HAND (modified_time 2026-08-12). THE BLANK-BATCH DEFECT IS CONFIRMED UNCHANGED and is now precisely bounded: Batch No is populated only through GLP-3R 5mg (2606100514); from GLP-1S 5mg onward EVERY entry renders an empty Batch No field - roughly 40+ of ~63 records. That means batch-tie is unverifiable for most of the live catalog, which is exactly what coa_documentation exists to test, so it HOLDS AT PENDING for a third run. IN THE VENDOR'S FAVOUR, AND IT MATTERS FOR HOW THIS IS CHARACTERISED: the methodology text is solid - HPLC purity plus LC-MS identity via Freedom Diagnostics, with an accession-number lookup portal - and every entry is PDF-linked. This reads as a data-entry gap, NOT as absent testing, and should be raised with the vendor as a fixable defect rather than treated as evidence of untested product. RUO framing verbatim: 'The products on this website are for legitimate research use only... not intended for human consumption.' Shipping and refund policies linked and live. Pricing carried at pass (catalog not re-read this run). UNVERIFIED (search summary only): PepPal reports no Trustpilot profile and no independent Finnrick/Janoshik testing history as of Aug 2026 - an absence of third-party data, not an adverse finding. FREEDOM DIAGNOSTICS CROSS-CUT applies here too: no ISO 17025 accreditation found for the lab (CLIA only, SECONDARY/unverified), no forgery allegation against the lab, public COA lookup exists - spot-check rather than trust on face. || PRIOR: 2026-08-24: coa_documentation stays PENDING but improving: /coa/ index grown ~45 -> ~63 entries (page modified 2026-08-12), all linking to downloadable Freedom Diagnostics HPLC+LC-MS PDFs — but only the first ~19 entries show batch numbers; everything from GLP-1S onward (~44 entries) has an empty Batch No field, so batch-tie remains unverifiable for most of the catalog. Minor date oddities recorded (SS-31 50mg PDF in a 2025/12 upload path with a 06/13/2026 test date; Tesamorelin 5mg in 2026/06 path dated 01/26/2026). RUO gate, disclaimers, refund/shipping pages, Sevierville TN address all present first-hand. || PRIOR: 2026-08-23: /coa/ RE-READ FIRST-HAND (modified 2026-08-12): new 07/02/2026 Freedom Diagnostics batches added since the cross-check, HPLC + LC-MS, plus an accession-number verification portal (freedomdiagnosticstesting.com) — genuine improvement. coa_documentation STAYS PENDING: index still ~45 compound entries vs ~74 catalog listings (yesterday's gap not closed) and many index rows show a BLANK 'Batch No' field. Context not scored: Gridinsoft algorithmic score 31/100 'Risky' (a scanner, not a user report); PepPal notes no independent Finnrick/Janoshik data. Nothing adverse Aug 21-23. || PRIOR: 2026-08-22: THE CATALOG CROSS-CHECK WAS RUN IN FULL — all SEVEN /shop/ pages AND /coa/ read first-hand in the same run, closing the single remaining step named on 2026-08-21. RESULT: catalog is ~74 listings (~62 in-stock; page 7 partly duplicative, see below); the COA index carries 42 UNIQUE COMPOUNDS across ~57 certificates (many with both a 01/26/2026 and a 06/13 or 07/02/2026 lot — the anti-recycling pattern re-confirmed first-hand). ~40 in-stock SKUs are covered. ~22 IN-STOCK, SELLABLE SK [...earlier history truncated - see compliance-reports/ for the full record...]