Research library

The studies behind the claims — and what model each one used.

Vendors cite research constantly, almost never with a link. This is the other version: every publication we have verified for a compound, transcribed from the PubMed record, with the experimental system stated on each entry. A citation list, not a claims page. For research use only.

14Verified studies
4Compounds covered
10Preclinical
0Clinical

Compounds with verified literature

4 of 40
Cosmetic

GHK-Cu

4 verified studies

2 preclinical 2 review 0 clinical
See the studies ›
Recovery

KPV

4 verified studies

4 preclinical 0 clinical
See the studies ›
Recovery

BPC-157

3 verified studies

2 preclinical 1 systematic review 0 clinical
See the studies ›
Recovery

TB-500

3 verified studies

2 preclinical 1 review 0 clinical
See the studies ›

Compounds are added as their literature is verified — one at a time, because each citation is checked by hand. The rest of the catalogue lives in the compound library.

How a citation gets on this page

01

Read back from the source

Every PMID is opened on PubMed and the title, authors, journal, volume, pages, year and DOI are transcribed from that record. Nothing is written from memory, and nothing is taken from a vendor's citation.

02

The model gets stated

The abstract decides the Model line: rat, mouse, human cell line, ex-vivo tissue. If we cannot tell what system a paper used, it does not go on the page.

03

Type is labelled honestly

Preclinical, review, systematic review or clinical — counted separately and shown on every card, so the size of the human evidence base is visible before you read a word.

04

No claims attached

We do not summarise a study as an effect, a benefit, or a reason to buy. The compounds indexed here are not approved drugs, and a citation is not a claim.

Why this exists. "Backed by research" is the most common line in peptide marketing and the least checkable. A rat tendon study is real science and a legitimate reason a compound interests researchers — it is not a trial. Putting the papers and their models in one place makes the difference obvious without anyone having to take our word for it.
Guide

BPC-157 vs TB-500 vs KPV vs GHK-Cu

Read ›
Testing

How to read a peptide COA

Read ›
Method

How we verify everything else

Open ›